History of New Wave/The French New Wave:
The French new wave is the style of film making that broke Hollywoods rules and inspired a new way of film making that has carried through to the present day. As an artistic movement that changed the way Hollywood saw film making - choosing to use natural environments rather than studio sets - it gave the directors a great deal more freedom when it came to shooting their films and has been remembered as a great influence much like cubism and surrealism. This style of film making meant that the craft was opened up to many young, aspiring film makers and other amateurs - the French new wave was a cultural revolution.
The new wave movement showed and reflected the change in lifestyle that was happening during the 1960s and how society was evolving. It took normal peoples lives and put them into cinema, being centred around young people, youth and a something new/a new life.
Thursday, 29 September 2016
Shutter Speed practice:
To investigate and practice using shutter speed, I chose to shoot three videos at different shutter speeds (1/30, 1/50 and 1/60). When it came to shooting the videos, however, I decided that it would be more effective to show a very high shutter speed as it would be a clearer exploration of the effect of shutter speed on the quality and visuals of the video. This video is shot at shutter speed 1/30, meaning that there is a slight motion blur and the aperture I used had o be very low so as to not over expose it.
To achieve this effect, I chose to use the following camera settings: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/30, 25fps, and aperture 5.8ff. When shooting at such a slow shutter speed, I found that it was difficult to make out the detail of the water and the over look of the video was quite dull.
This scene shot highlights what I mean and shows that the slow shutter speed increases the amount of motion blur and makes the water appear as though it is a smooth continuous stream. I do feel that my choice to shoot a garden hose/water was good though as it means that the full effect of shutter speed on film is evident.
For this video, I shot at shutter speed 1/50 so that the visual appearance of the water would be closer to that which humans see with there naked eye. The shutter speed should always be double the number of the frame rate, for example: if you're shooting at a frame rate of 25fps you should shoot with a shutter speed of 1/50. This means that although the appearance of the water is still smooth, it is what people see with their natural eye - this is also the type of frame rate to shutter speed ratio that most directors and film makers use.
To achieve this effect, I used the following settings: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/50, 25fps, and aperture 7. Because I was shooting at a higher shutter speed, I had to change the aperture to allow less light into the camera and prevent it getting over exposed, however, this meant that I had to refocus the camera.
This scene shot shows that the higher the shutter speed, the less motion blur there is. It also shows the trouble I had when it came to refocusing the camera, however, that could also just be a little amount of motion blur from the garden hose moving as it was hand held.
This final video shows the effect of the shutter speed on the footage at both 1/100 and 1/400. The stream of water presented at this shutter speed shows that there is no visible continuous stream and instead the individual droplets of water and details are clearer.
To achieve these effects, I first set my camera to: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/100, 25fps, and aperture 10; and then to: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/400, 25fps, and aperture 10. As these two shutter speed are quite high, the details are very clear but the exposure also made the lighting a great deal crisper, meaning that it looks more like a photograph or unreal that the other two videos do. Because of this unnatural looking appearance that shooting at such a high shutter speed gives, directors and film makers usually elect not to use it.
These two screen shots show how much detail is visible at high shutter speeds - because there is such a high shutter speed there is very little motion blur. I found that it was a great deal more difficult to focus the camera when using these high shutter speeds because I had to focus on the individual droplets rather than on a constant stream like with the slower shutter speeds.
To investigate and practice using shutter speed, I chose to shoot three videos at different shutter speeds (1/30, 1/50 and 1/60). When it came to shooting the videos, however, I decided that it would be more effective to show a very high shutter speed as it would be a clearer exploration of the effect of shutter speed on the quality and visuals of the video. This video is shot at shutter speed 1/30, meaning that there is a slight motion blur and the aperture I used had o be very low so as to not over expose it.
To achieve this effect, I chose to use the following camera settings: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/30, 25fps, and aperture 5.8ff. When shooting at such a slow shutter speed, I found that it was difficult to make out the detail of the water and the over look of the video was quite dull.
This scene shot highlights what I mean and shows that the slow shutter speed increases the amount of motion blur and makes the water appear as though it is a smooth continuous stream. I do feel that my choice to shoot a garden hose/water was good though as it means that the full effect of shutter speed on film is evident.
To achieve this effect, I used the following settings: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/50, 25fps, and aperture 7. Because I was shooting at a higher shutter speed, I had to change the aperture to allow less light into the camera and prevent it getting over exposed, however, this meant that I had to refocus the camera.
This scene shot shows that the higher the shutter speed, the less motion blur there is. It also shows the trouble I had when it came to refocusing the camera, however, that could also just be a little amount of motion blur from the garden hose moving as it was hand held.
This final video shows the effect of the shutter speed on the footage at both 1/100 and 1/400. The stream of water presented at this shutter speed shows that there is no visible continuous stream and instead the individual droplets of water and details are clearer.
To achieve these effects, I first set my camera to: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/100, 25fps, and aperture 10; and then to: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/400, 25fps, and aperture 10. As these two shutter speed are quite high, the details are very clear but the exposure also made the lighting a great deal crisper, meaning that it looks more like a photograph or unreal that the other two videos do. Because of this unnatural looking appearance that shooting at such a high shutter speed gives, directors and film makers usually elect not to use it.
These two screen shots show how much detail is visible at high shutter speeds - because there is such a high shutter speed there is very little motion blur. I found that it was a great deal more difficult to focus the camera when using these high shutter speeds because I had to focus on the individual droplets rather than on a constant stream like with the slower shutter speeds.
Monday, 26 September 2016
Aperture practice:
I shot these three videos to investigate the use of aperture in filming and to experiment with the effect it has. This first video shows my experimentation at shooting with an aperture of 2.8ff. The use of shallow focus draws the viewers attention to the object/person that is in focus, meaning that it is a good device for narrative story telling in films and other moving image texts. To gain this low aperture, I chose to use the following camera settings: ISO 200, shutter speed 1/60, 25fps, and aperture 2.8ff. This video was also shot on a 50mm lens meaning that the aperture was able to go lower than most normal/wide angle lenses. To make sure that I got the correct exposure, I decided to change the ISO so that the aperture and shutter speed could remain the same and the overall quality of the video was not affected.
When shooting this video at aperture 2.8, I found that it was difficult to find an area/place that would allow me to explore the full use of such a shallow depth of field. I do feel as though my choice to shoot the clips using an old plant pot on the corner meant that the desired effect of a low aperture was shown clearly.
In this video, I shot at an aperture of 8ff meaning that there was a larger field of focus than there was at 2.8. This type of aperture is usually used when there is more to focus on in a scene, but it isn't necessary to be aware of the background. To achieve this depth of field, I used the settings: ISO 400, shutter speed 1/60, 25fps, and aperture 8ff. This video was shot on a standard/wide angle lens, meaning that the aperture could go down as far. Like the previous video, to try and gain the correct exposure for this clip I chose to alter the ISO and leave the aperture and shutter speed as they were.
Although the video is clear, in post-shoot editing I realised that the exposure is incorrect/the ISO was too high and has resulted in the footage being slightly over-exposed. This means that the overall quality of the clip isn't as good as the top video and appears to be foggy and possibly focused wrong. In the future I am going to make sure I check the footage before finishing a shoot so that I don't end up with videos that are over exposed again.
This final video, I shot at aperture 16ff meaning that there was a wider depth of field and a greater amount of the footage was in focus. This aperture is often used when the director of a text has encoded a variety of subjects in the mise-en-scene that the audience should take notice of or there is no particular object that the viewer needs to focus on. To achieve this effect, I chose to use the following camera settings: ISO 400, shutter speed 1/60, 25fps, and aperture 16ff. I shot this video on a standard camera lens, meaning that the aperture couldn't go as high and I had to shoot at an aperture of 16.
The exposure of this video, much like that of the video above, is not correct/too bright meaning that the appearance of the footage isn't clear and appears almost foggy. If I had to reshoot this video I would make sure that I reviewed the quality of the footage before finishing the shoot, this would mean that the exposure could have been corrected before it came to editing and that the visual quality and appeal of the video would have been better.
When shooting this video at aperture 2.8, I found that it was difficult to find an area/place that would allow me to explore the full use of such a shallow depth of field. I do feel as though my choice to shoot the clips using an old plant pot on the corner meant that the desired effect of a low aperture was shown clearly.
In this video, I shot at an aperture of 8ff meaning that there was a larger field of focus than there was at 2.8. This type of aperture is usually used when there is more to focus on in a scene, but it isn't necessary to be aware of the background. To achieve this depth of field, I used the settings: ISO 400, shutter speed 1/60, 25fps, and aperture 8ff. This video was shot on a standard/wide angle lens, meaning that the aperture could go down as far. Like the previous video, to try and gain the correct exposure for this clip I chose to alter the ISO and leave the aperture and shutter speed as they were.
Although the video is clear, in post-shoot editing I realised that the exposure is incorrect/the ISO was too high and has resulted in the footage being slightly over-exposed. This means that the overall quality of the clip isn't as good as the top video and appears to be foggy and possibly focused wrong. In the future I am going to make sure I check the footage before finishing a shoot so that I don't end up with videos that are over exposed again.
This final video, I shot at aperture 16ff meaning that there was a wider depth of field and a greater amount of the footage was in focus. This aperture is often used when the director of a text has encoded a variety of subjects in the mise-en-scene that the audience should take notice of or there is no particular object that the viewer needs to focus on. To achieve this effect, I chose to use the following camera settings: ISO 400, shutter speed 1/60, 25fps, and aperture 16ff. I shot this video on a standard camera lens, meaning that the aperture couldn't go as high and I had to shoot at an aperture of 16.
The exposure of this video, much like that of the video above, is not correct/too bright meaning that the appearance of the footage isn't clear and appears almost foggy. If I had to reshoot this video I would make sure that I reviewed the quality of the footage before finishing the shoot, this would mean that the exposure could have been corrected before it came to editing and that the visual quality and appeal of the video would have been better.
Investigating different types of new wave:
Although each new wave style has the same goals and concept, there are slight differences between them - this was due to them all being strongly influenced by the society of the country in that time period. In Czechoslovakian New wave, the main influence was the political liberation that was introduced in the 1960s giving film makers and other artist the freedom to create work with a more controversial twist and about taboo topics. This new freedom lead to the Czech new wave film makers being a great deal more creative and making very obscure, and often indecipherable texts. The Czech new wave movement lasted from 1962 through to the early 1970s meaning that a large amount of film texts were created and produced during this time.
The Hong Kong new wave movement happened a little later than the new waves from places like France and America, taking place in the late 1970s to well into the 80s. The greatest influence for this new wave style was the western influence that the Chinese directors had and the western-style education given to them through their lives. This lead to Hong Kong new wave film makers creating texts that chose to be stylistically incoherent - meaning that there was a clear distinction between the new filmmakers of the era and the older ones.
French new wave was the spark that egnited an explosion of new, creative styles of film making. Taking place from the late 1950s through to the early 70s, the french new wave movement produced a very large number of films which were influenced by the directors and their personal lives/experiences. Due to the french new wave being the first of its kind and sparking such a massive and memorable change, films like Breathless (1960) and The 400 Blows (1959) have been remembered for all their new, creative and interesting was of film making.
Although each new wave style has the same goals and concept, there are slight differences between them - this was due to them all being strongly influenced by the society of the country in that time period. In Czechoslovakian New wave, the main influence was the political liberation that was introduced in the 1960s giving film makers and other artist the freedom to create work with a more controversial twist and about taboo topics. This new freedom lead to the Czech new wave film makers being a great deal more creative and making very obscure, and often indecipherable texts. The Czech new wave movement lasted from 1962 through to the early 1970s meaning that a large amount of film texts were created and produced during this time.

French new wave was the spark that egnited an explosion of new, creative styles of film making. Taking place from the late 1950s through to the early 70s, the french new wave movement produced a very large number of films which were influenced by the directors and their personal lives/experiences. Due to the french new wave being the first of its kind and sparking such a massive and memorable change, films like Breathless (1960) and The 400 Blows (1959) have been remembered for all their new, creative and interesting was of film making.
Wednesday, 21 September 2016
New Wave Cinema:
The new wave style of film making was created in the 1960s as an answer to the repetitive and formulaic structure to Hollywood films. New wave cinema, pioneered by directors such as Jean-Luc Godard and Francois Truffaut, was designed and created to break the rules and create something completely different and a new experience, which audiences loved. New wave film making is recognised as freeing the way that films were made - it is profound for the use of natural footage out on the streets as opposed to using studios or fixed sets and is enduring, much like cubism and surrealism.
There are various different types of new wave cinema, due to it being a wide spread film making style across various countries. Some of these include: French New Wave, American New Wave, Hong Kong New Wave and Czech New Wave. Some of the notable conventions for new wave cinema are the following:
- They included mistakes in the final film
- Handheld camera
- Hidden cameras in natural environments (e.g. streets and buildings - meaning that the reactions of people are genuine)
- Breaking the forth wall and director having cameos in their own films
- Syncopated editing
- Jump cuts (often moving from one scene to another with no explanation)
- Long takes with static/mobile or lateral tracking
- Interior monologues and random comments
- Sound doesn't always match the video, due to the sound being added post filming
The new wave style of film making was created in the 1960s as an answer to the repetitive and formulaic structure to Hollywood films. New wave cinema, pioneered by directors such as Jean-Luc Godard and Francois Truffaut, was designed and created to break the rules and create something completely different and a new experience, which audiences loved. New wave film making is recognised as freeing the way that films were made - it is profound for the use of natural footage out on the streets as opposed to using studios or fixed sets and is enduring, much like cubism and surrealism.
There are various different types of new wave cinema, due to it being a wide spread film making style across various countries. Some of these include: French New Wave, American New Wave, Hong Kong New Wave and Czech New Wave. Some of the notable conventions for new wave cinema are the following:
- They included mistakes in the final film
- Handheld camera
- Hidden cameras in natural environments (e.g. streets and buildings - meaning that the reactions of people are genuine)
- Breaking the forth wall and director having cameos in their own films
- Syncopated editing
- Jump cuts (often moving from one scene to another with no explanation)
- Long takes with static/mobile or lateral tracking
- Interior monologues and random comments
- Sound doesn't always match the video, due to the sound being added post filming
ISO practice:
These are two short videos showing my exploration of ISO and its affect on the footage/footage quality. For these videos, I chose to use ISO 100 to shoot outside and ISO 1600 to shoot inside. The difference in quality that ISO makes is very evident in these videos, the first video (ISO 100) being a very smooth image although a little dark, and the second video (ISO 1600) is a great deal grainier although the footage is brighter. I feel as though these videos are really effective when it comes to showing the effect that ISO can have on the quality of footage.
To investigate the effect of ISO on video quality, I chose to set my camera to 24fps, shutter speed 1/50, and an aperture of 5.6ff. As I wanted to explore the full effect of ISO, I decided to keep the exposure as it came out. While shooting this I had some trouble as it was raining and the camera lens kept getting clouded by water landing on it.
To investigate the effect of ISO on video quality, I chose to set my camera to 24fps, shutter speed 1/50, and an aperture of 5.6ff. As I wanted to explore the full effect of ISO, I decided to keep the exposure as it came out. While shooting this I had some trouble as it was raining and the camera lens kept getting clouded by water landing on it.
Friday, 16 September 2016
Pull Focus practice:
This is a short video I made to practice the technique of 'pull focus', this is when the focal point of the frame is changed by pulling the focus from one part of the image to another. Pull focus can be used to great effect when conveying to the audience a different point of interest in the scene or where they should focus.
To achieve this effect, I used to following camera settings: 24fps, 1/50 shutter speed, 5.6ff aperture. As I wanted to maintain some quality in the video capture, I had to keep changing the ISO to try to gain the correct exposure.
Although I managed to try out and practice this technique, I experienced a great deal of problems due to my hands shaking and there not being a tripod for me to use - this lead to there being some footage that I was unable to use. In addition, I had some instances of footage where the exposure is wrong and the clips have come out too dark/under exposed (this is shown in the coat hangers clip included in the video).
To achieve this effect, I used to following camera settings: 24fps, 1/50 shutter speed, 5.6ff aperture. As I wanted to maintain some quality in the video capture, I had to keep changing the ISO to try to gain the correct exposure.
Although I managed to try out and practice this technique, I experienced a great deal of problems due to my hands shaking and there not being a tripod for me to use - this lead to there being some footage that I was unable to use. In addition, I had some instances of footage where the exposure is wrong and the clips have come out too dark/under exposed (this is shown in the coat hangers clip included in the video).
Tuesday, 13 September 2016
Lighting Equipment and Set-up for Certain Scenarios:

2 - Additional light source. The use of an additional light source could be necessary to create desired effects.
The pros and cons of this lighting set-up are that there will be a good/large amount of light going into the image, however, it could create an unwanted amount of contrast/shadow in the footage or image.
A small
documentary where portability is paramount:
1 - LED torch. This is a lighting method for better lighting and the ability to shoot footage during
the night if so desired. It is also easily portable as LED lights/lighting rigs can come in a variety of sizes.
2 - Reflector. This will allow the director to bring more light onto subjects close to the frame if necessary. Reflectors are also fairly cheap and fold down to make them very easily portable.
The pros and cons of this type of lighting set-up are that the subject/subject matter of the image will be well lit, however, the amount of light may be too much and the footage could end up being over exposed.
The pros and cons of this type of lighting set-up are that the subject/subject matter of the image will be well lit, however, the amount of light may be too much and the footage could end up being over exposed.
‘Talking Head’
style interview:
1 - Soft box. The use of a soft box creates a more natural lighting of the face and allows the subject to be see clearly (it can also give the footage a softer appearance).
2 - Reflector. This will allow more light to be bought into the image without over exposing the footage.
The pros and cons of this type of lighting set-up are that the director will be able to use a shallow depth of field for the footage, however, the use of natural lighting for the interview could be more effective.

A ‘night
time’ shoot:
1 - Spot light/LED torch. This will provide the lighting for the image (if no other natural or environmental source is on hand) as well as being used to highlight certain parts of the scene.2 - Additional light source. The use of an additional light source could be necessary to create desired effects.
The pros and cons of this lighting set-up are that there will be a good/large amount of light going into the image, however, it could create an unwanted amount of contrast/shadow in the footage or image.
How and Why Lighting affects Camera Techniques:
There are a variety of different lighting styles to consider
when planning a shoot, for example: using low-key lighting style adds more
contrast and a darker appearance to an image, whereas using high-key lighting
means there is less contrast but a brighter appearance to the image. In
addition to this there are the choices to use hard light or soft light, which
give the image a sharper look (hard light) or a softer look (soft light). In
moving image texts, the villainous character is usually lit with a hard light –
occasionally with low-key lighting as well, however it is more common for these
two to be combined to light horror films. Low-key lighting and hard lighting
can be achieved/created by using a smaller, dimmer light source and a darker
room or area, soft lighting and high-key lighting being created in the opposite
way (a larger, brighter light source in a more well lit room/area. Where
lighting is usually used for visibility and to show the scene to the audience,
it can also be used a more stylistic way which tends to be different for each
person.
Lighting is
a very important technique when it comes to shooting photography and moving
image as it can effect both the quality and atmosphere of the scene. The three
main components to consider when using a camera are the ISO, aperture and
shutter speed. To gain the best quality and correct exposure, each of these
settings must be in balance – if not the image/footage will be under exposed
(too dark) or over exposed (too bright). In addition, using creative lighting
set ups can give an image more dimension and a different appeal all together.
![]() |
Under Exposed | Correctly Exposed | Over Exposed |
The manipulation and construction of a lighting set-up can
vastly alter the look of an image/scene, and allows a person to create and
encode meaning and emotion into their product. It also means that the colours,
saturation and legibility of the text can be altered – creating a warmer
appearance with more orangey hues or a colder and under saturated look.
Bibliography:
Earnest, A (2013) 'Lighting for Production Photography'. Buffalo: Amherst Media.
Lawrence, J (2012) 'Photographing Shadow and Lights'. Amphoto Books.
Bibliography:
Earnest, A (2013) 'Lighting for Production Photography'. Buffalo: Amherst Media.
Lawrence, J (2012) 'Photographing Shadow and Lights'. Amphoto Books.
Development of Editing Technology:
The first instance of editing in history was in 1900s when George Méliès pioneered the ‘jump cut’ edit, which he used in his films to make
objects and people disappear and or change them into different things –
creating the idea of magic in early cinema. This was shown to effect in his films
such as ‘Trip to the Moon’, (1902). This sparked a change in cinematography for
ever, moving away from the documentary style of filming to a narrative which portrayed
fictional stories. D W Giffith, a younger director working under Méliès and Porter, went
on to create inter-cutting, cross-cutting and the continuity cut which changed
the style of film making. This then lead on to the Soviet Union Russia creation
of montage editing.
The Digital Era (CMX-600, Edit Droid and Avid 1):
Early editing - Cutting:

Moviola:
The moviola was created in 1924 in the USA. This was a machine
that allowed editors to watch the film as they decided where to cut it and the
sound, however it wasn't until the invention of the flatbed that both the film footage and the sound could be edited and cut at the same time. This style of editing was used for films such as ‘The Jazz Singer’.
The creation of the moviola lead on to the flatbed edit suite, a
machine that allowed film and sound to be played at the same time and edited
together while seen on a small scene. In addition to this, the flatbed edit
suite meant that the film reel could be played forwards, backwards and at
different speeds. This then became the standard form of editing for Hollywood and
various rules were put in place for how film text could be edited – it also
lead to the French New wave style of film making which purposefully broke the
rules of Hollywood editing.
The Digital Era (CMX-600, Edit Droid and Avid 1):
Linear and Non-Linear editing:
In 1991 one of the first pieces of digital editing software/technology was
introduced, the Avid 1. This followed the CMX-600 software and gave the film makers more freedom when it came to
merging sounds with video footage and also changing the length of shots/scenes.
The Avid 1 sparked a whole new wave of editing technology and changed the way
films were created all together – meaning digital software (such as Premiere
Pro) has been used from then all the way to the present day.
Online and Offline editing:
The creation of online and offline editing is typically associated
with VHS tapes – which has now been widely replaced by the use of CDs. Offline
editing allows the person to make a rough cut of the text, meaning that it can
be done in a less-expensive way as well as using a lower resolution copy of the
film footage. After the rough cut has been approved, the film will go into be
edited and put together to create the final online version.
With the introduction of the Avid 1, the future of editing was
pushed along the digital path, leading to the introduction of various other
types of digital editing software being created. The most popular of these being Adobe Premiere Pro and Final Cut - released by Apple. These programs allow virtually anyone to create films or videos to a high quality and for a less expensive/more affordable price. In addition, a greater range of services and creative effects are available to the user, such as changing the colour saturation and quality of the footage.
Monday, 5 September 2016
Easy Rider (1969):
The meaning behind this clip -
reflecting the way that the people in the clip feel during their acid trip -
has been constructed via varying camera shot types, angles, lighting techniques
and sound. One of these creative devises included in the clip is the use of
camera panning up the building, and continuing until the camera faces into the sun
creating a giant lens flare, from 0:56 - 1:27. This constructs the
representation of the characters slowly losing their senses as the
hallucinogenic drug takes effect. This has been encoded so that audience
members can gain the preferred reading that the characters have taken LSD
(or at the least some drug to that effect). The
combining of this panning shot with a low angle shot means that the audience is
able to gain this preferred reading through the camera (as it presents
them with the point of view of the people within the scene) conveys this view
to be their point of view, more specifically the point of view of the two
persons on the floor. This panning shot has various other shots cut into it,
these cut-away shots show the main four characters in this scene and a woman
reciting a biblical passage of some description. The use of encoding these cut-away
shots into the narrative of the scene allows the viewer to decode the text with
the reading that the LSD the people have taken is slowly taking affect and the
thoughts of each member are becoming distorted and broken up.
The use of sound in this clip is
used to show the delusional/drug induced mind-set of the
characters. Combining and overlaying multiple different soundtracks in
post-production means that the audience is unclear as to what sound is actually
taking place in the scene and what is fake, allowing them to gain
the preferred reading that the characters have taken LSD. At the start of the clip, along with small amount of
dialogue there is a clunking/almost train track or factory machine sound. This creates
the idea that they are near some kind of railway or possibly industrial area.
The noise continues and, when the characters within the scene have taken the
drug, snippets of a woman reading a bible verse/prayer are cut in and
mixed/interchanged with the factory machine clanking. This gives the audience a
reading that there is possibly a funeral going on in the cemetery whilst they
are there – giving sense to the man in a business suit who is shown very
briefly at 1:37. The preferred reading of the text, being that they have taken LSD
a hallucinogenic drug, would mean that the audience decodes some aspects of the
scene (the man in the suit, the non-diegetic sound of machinery that is present
throughout the scene) are things that have been created by the characters drug
induced minds and are in fact not real. The fact that Dennis Hopper’s character
says “shut up” when the accompaniment of church preaching and factory machine
sound merge together indicated to the viewer that he is struggling to block out
the sounds and possibly an inner turmoil – possibly the fact that he sold
drugs, linking to the overall narrative of the text.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)